IoT Leaders: The Broken Economics of Roaming

Podcasts

One of the biggest misses in the IoT industry, frankly, is that so few things are connected globally — only about 20%.

In this episode, Nick interviews Steffen Sorrell, Chief of Research at Kaleido Intelligence, about why global connectivity is so complex.

What we talked about:

  • Reasons for connectivity complexity
  • The fractured economic model of roaming
  • The promise of eSIM versus the reality of eSIM
  • The importance of the SM-DP and the SM-SR
  • An abstracted agnostic platform to solve some of these issues

Download the Kaleido Intelligence Report

Read the transcript

Listen on your favourite podcast player

eSIM Localisation

5 ways eSIM localisation can solve permanent roaming challenges

Kaleido Intelligence research found that eSIM and localisation eliminate the future risks with roaming for IoT. This highly secure solution helps to overcome legal and network restrictions, simplify complex connectivity supply chains, all while offering highly reliable connectivity – critical factors to IoT project launches and longevity.

Discover 5 ways eSIM localisation can solve common pain points surrounding roaming and regulations in this 1-minute whitepaper.

Learn more
Connectivity Management

Complete Control

Manage your global IoT estate

Eseye’s AnyNet SIM contains multiple Tier 1 MNO multi-IMSI bootstraps and Step2 profiles. Coupled with the AnyNet Connectivity Management platform, you can manage and localise your IoT estate’s connectivity with ease. Learn more about the unique technology in our AnyNet+ SIMs.

Learn more

Eliminate the connectivity risk of permanent roaming
with eSIM localisation from Eseye.

Get in touch

Transcript

Intro (00:01):
You’re listening to IoT Leaders, a podcast from Eseye that shares real IoT stories from the field about digital transformation swings and misses, lessons learned and innovation strategies that work. In each episode, you’ll hear our conversations with top digitization leaders on how IoT is changing the world for the better. Let IoT leaders be your guide to IoT digital transformation and innovation. Let’s get into the show.

Nick Earle (00:31):
Welcome to the latest episode of IoT Leader’s podcasts. The podcast that attempts to demystify the very complex and often confusing world of IoT. And I’m absolutely delighted in this episode to welcome Steffen Sorrell. Steffen is the chief of research at Kaleido Intelligence. So Steffen, welcome to the podcast.

Steffen Sorrell (00:55):
Yeah. Hello, thanks for having me on Nick.

Nick Earle (00:57):
Sure, you’re welcome. This week’s episode is all about the eSIM and we’re going to really try and double click on this and demystify the eSIM, not just in terms of the technology, but in terms of what it is, why it’s needed, what problems it solves, what are the current advantages and disadvantages of it, the state of the market, where it might go in the future, but ultimately what are the benefits to customers in terms of deploying IoT projects off the eSIM?

Nick Earle (01:31):
Now I have to say to our listeners that Kaleido Research and Steffen in particular have a released a 20 page research report on this that Eseye was involved in and that is available now. So if you’re finding this absolutely fascinating, which I hope you are, don’t feel the need to make furious notes on this because pretty much all that we cover hopefully is in the report and a lot more, but I’m sure as always, we’ll get lots of opinions and views on the wider subjects as well.

Nick Earle (02:04):
So the report, just so you know, it’ll be available through Eseye website and it’s called ‘Solving permanent roaming challenges through eSIM and localization’ whitepaper. You’ll find that and it’ll give you a lot more detailed information on this. So with that, let’s get going. And as we always do on these podcasts Steffen, let’s first of all get to know you as a person. Where were you born, how did you end up in market research and analyst company?

Steffen Sorrell (02:36):
I was born in Eastbourne, which is in the south of the UK. I’ve always thought of myself as a Brighton lad. I went to college there and after university, I went to live back there for a bit, found it a bit more exciting than-

Nick Earle (02:49):
And what do you do at the university, just as background?

Steffen Sorrell (02:51):
Actually I did a modern languages degree, which is a bit of a ways away from the industry I’m in now. But after I finished my degree, I started working in the FMCG sector. I became an analyst.

Nick Earle (03:05):
That’s fast moving consumer goods.

Steffen Sorrell (03:08):
Fast moving consumer goods, right. I was working for a big American company there as an analyst and while I was doing that, I sort of got a bit more interested in things like software development. So I started doing another degree remotely while I was doing this. And I came across the internet of things during this software development course. And that led me to a research house called Juniper Research.

Nick Earle (03:32):
Let’s just take it easy. You covered a few things there. You did a degree in modern languages, then you were working in the software field and you started doing another degree, is that what you’re saying?

Steffen Sorrell (03:45):
I was working in the FMCG.

Nick Earle (03:46):
FMCG, excuse me and then you did another degree.

Steffen Sorrell (03:48):
I was doing a degree in my spare time.

Nick Earle (03:51):
And that led you into IoT?

Steffen Sorrell (03:54):
That got me interested in IoT. I first discovered about the Smart Home back in those days and that led me to become interested in becoming a research analyst.

Nick Earle (04:05):
And that took you to Juniper.

Steffen Sorrell (04:07):
Yep. So I worked at Juniper Research 10 years or so. And funnily enough, I was covering the IoT side of the business. So actually my first report back in the day was on the Smart Home sector. So yeah, I worked there over the years and as time passed, I think myself and a couple of colleagues who were also working at Juniper felt that maybe there were some areas of markets that we were looking at that we could cover in more detail, go a bit deeper, really get under the skin.

Nick Earle (04:43):
Right, Juniper has a pretty broad research-

Steffen Sorrell (04:45):
That’s right. They do cover a lot of areas, but I think we wanted to do a bit more. So we then branched off a couple of years ago. Myself and two colleagues from Juniper, we started a research firm called Kaleido Intelligence. I’m one of the founding members and in that we are looking at mobile roaming as well as mobile connectivity.

Nick Earle (05:11):
Perfect background to the podcast. And so with that background, that’s why I said, I couldn’t think of anyone better to cover this subject which is a complicated one. So let’s see if we can unpack it. Let’s start off by first of all, talking about subject that we have raised on this podcast a few times before, which is I call it what the hell happened, because if we go back in the day when I first started off looking at this area about 2010 or so when I was in Cisco. We at Cisco and others like Ericsson and an IBM and others, we all confidently predicted 50 billion things going to be connected, Smart Home as you say was clearly going to be one of them but not just Smart Home.

Nick Earle (05:54):
It was basically anything with power and an IP address be connected by now, we’d be here by now and then now we’re in 2021. We look back and say, well, actually we got to 11 billion things. So we got to just over 20% and I call that one of the biggest misses in the IT industry. So from your point of view, because ultimately this is a road that’s going to lead to how the eSIM and the way it’s implemented can address some of these issues. But from your point of view, let’s start off with, what do you think are the main issues to do with why we as an industry missed so badly?

Steffen Sorrell (06:27):
I think that the biggest issue is that it’s not as simple as everyone thought it would be. You can’t just say, oh, well look, here’s my device, I can ship it anywhere in the world, it will work, it will provide me data and I’ll be able to get insights from that data. It’s nowhere near that simple. I mean, you’ve got complexity around the hardware design for IoT projects. IoT is a mishmash of different ideas, different end goals, different ways to do it, which means the majority of products, it’s not just like an off the shelf thing. It’s not like a mobile phone where you just buy it off the shelf and it works.

Nick Earle (07:10):
And I think that piece is a really key thing because we find that, we’ve said before 2009, we already do IoT as well and we have 2000 customers and it is amazingly common how often customers come to us who are in the IoT business. I’m the project manager for an IoT project, but there’s this perception that, well, I can put a SIM in to a mobile phone and it works. So I kind of assumed that was a given, that I’m going to concentrate on all the other elements of IoT, particularly the application integration, the data usage, the security. But something as basic as the device and the connectivity, it’s really difficult, isn’t it?

Steffen Sorrell (07:54):
Yeah, that’s right. When you look at the connectivity market today, I mean, when you have an IoT device, you can’t just have one SIM and say, this thing is going to work anywhere in the world to the quality that I need it to work because of the way that the industry is structured. It’s not that simple.

Nick Earle (08:17):
And the industry is structured and look at the MNOs, mobile network operators. The industry is structured, it’s a whole series of verticals, proprietary stovepipes. I mean, essentially the MNOs have a proprietary SIM and that proprietary SIM forces the connection on onto them. It’s the way the model works, which works for cell phones with some roaming and we’ll get into this. But clearly does not work for IoT. If the goal is the holy grail is what you said which is why couldn’t I just have one SIM in a device that just connects. And I think for all of us as an industry, we either ignored the problem or we kind of assumed that that will be possible back in 2010 and now we’re faced with this issue.

Nick Earle (09:06):
So we know that connectivity is an issue, let me go to the next question, which you must get asked all the time. After we say to people what it’s not that simple and they go, well, what do you mean? And then their eyes start to glaze, particularly the, oh God, I didn’t realize we had to do this and I don’t know anything about hardware. And they say, well, can’t I buy a device off the shelf but it’s not going to be optimized for the use case that you want to solve, so it’s not like the iPhone.

Nick Earle (09:37):
So the question then becomes about, surely roaming solves this. Because it seems to solve it on my mobile phone, isn’t that what roaming, nevermind this eSIM stuff, the first thing they say is, yeah, but isn’t that what roaming does? You guys are real deep experts on roaming, that’s what your website says that you do. So what’s your take on that? Why doesn’t roaming just solve that problem?

Steffen Sorrell (10:05):
I think first thing we have to do is go back to how roaming was originally established. So it’s a series of agreements between operators based on an understanding mostly of bilateral traffic. And these agreements were made at a time when the internet of things or the business model was made at a time when the internet things didn’t really exist, M2M was barely even a thing at the time. And really the idea is that, we humans like to think we’re special, but actually we are quite predictable in terms of how we travel, how we use our devices. And that is what the roaming business model is about. It’s about predictability in terms of, okay, this number of connections or this much data is going to be used in a roaming scenario on my network for a short amount of time. People don’t go abroad and live there and then roam.

Nick Earle (11:02):
Normally it’s like three months, isn’t it?

Steffen Sorrell (11:03):
Exactly.

Nick Earle (11:04):
Three months on the network and then by which time you’ve gone back.

Steffen Sorrell (11:08):
Yeah, longer than 90 days, you can consider that devices as permanently roaming, which is a special use case and it’s actually challenging. So I think we’ll probably get into a bit later. But when you have that business model transferred to machines and we talked just now about how IoT is very customized, the fact that it’s bespoke from project to project, the type of use case is different from project to project which means the data, the usage, where these devices are shipped and used is no longer unpredictable. And that doesn’t fit the roaming business model, which is based on that predictability. So that’s one side of it.

Nick Earle (11:54):
Just to make sure I understand that, so that is an interesting way of looking at it. If I repeat it back, what you’re saying is the roaming agreements were basically built out of the consumer voice essentially.

Steffen Sorrell (12:07):
Yeah, exactly.

Nick Earle (12:08):
Where there was a degree of predictability. So I’m network A and I’m going to do, I’m a European MNO and I’m going to do a roaming agreement with the US MNO. But it’s because I know that I’ve got customers on my network in the UK and when they go on holiday to the US or they work perhaps few weeks there, I know that they’re typically roaming in the US and then they’re going to come back within 90 days.

Nick Earle (12:34):
So I’ll just do an agreement, like a reciprocal trade agreement, if you like, between the MNO in the US, the MNO probably do similar one for American tourists coming to the UK. And we’ll just say, we have a quota. I’ll let you have a, I guess, these roaming agreements, are they structured around a certain number of devices and/or a certain percentage of the traffic? Is that typically how they get structured?

Steffen Sorrell (13:01):
Yeah, pretty much. It’s based on expected volumes but the major difference is today’s smartphones are all high volume data devices. So when wholesale agreements are made and those are based on traffic, then an operator can expect a reasonable return. But then when you have an IoT device, a lot of those devices are not consuming-

Nick Earle (13:32):
A large amount of data. The data is small.

Steffen Sorrell (13:35):
Exactly. So for example, when we look at the roaming market, when we look at the wholesale, so the inbound roaming market in terms of revenues, over 70% of that market is covered by IoT devices that are using more than a hundred megabytes per month, which is a very unusual amount of data for an IoT device to be using. Normally it’s definitely less than a hundred, in some cases, maybe between between 10 megabytes or something. And the revenues that you can get from that are very, very small from a wholesale perspective.

Steffen Sorrell (14:11):
So in that sense, the business model to allow lots of devices to come in, that don’t produce a lot of data is not a great one. You’re not getting any money from the data consumption, but you’re still having to cover your signaling overheads. So the IoT devices are still sending traffic over the ever signaling-

Nick Earle (14:32):
Pay for physical infrastructure, Cisco switches say your pipes, but you’re getting a percentage of a small number. And as data prices drop and IoT devices start proliferating and start sending frankly less and less data of the narrow band and LPWAN, you’re getting a percentage of a declining number, but your Cisco routers and switches aren’t coming down to cost accordingly. So that presents a, would you call it a growing financial disincentive in the industry?

Steffen Sorrell (15:12):
Exactly. Exactly, yeah. I think we’re seeing that fear of, so we talked about how a lot of IoT devices can spend a long time in the country and contrast her to humans.

Nick Earle (15:23):
Yes. And you don’t know in advance. It’s not like I bought an airline ticket, I’m coming back in two weeks after my holiday in Florida. I’m making a hundred thousand widgets and a certain number of them, I don’t know how many will be sold in the US and will stay there.

Steffen Sorrell (15:40):
Yeah. And the more devices you have out there, the lower the incentive for the on printer, if they’re producing small amounts of data only.

Nick Earle (15:48):
So the theme Steffen, and we definitely hear this, I’m glad we’re shining a light on this because I don’t think people do understand this is that you’re describing as an analyst firm that spends all their time doing this. In fact, you even left one firm and found another one just specifically to go into this. It’s a model which is A, if I were to repeat, built for the consumer, initially consumer boys, but certainly the consumer market. And B is set based on a set of assumptions that are not just applicable to IoT, but increasingly inapplicable to IoT.

Nick Earle (16:29):
As the number of devices grows, the financial incentive and the practicality of roaming agreements drops. And would you say that, and that’s only going to carry on, nothing that you’ve said says that there’s something coming and certainly we’ll get onto eSIM, but unless you change the model, what’s going to happen is roaming is just not going to be financially worth it. And would you say for the operators and if roaming goes away, then connectivity goes away. So would you say that this is one of the reasons why we were seeing, and certainly we’re seeing this, an increasing number of roaming agreements being terminated at very short notice?

Steffen Sorrell (17:08):
Yes. So there’s two major elements which are placing pressure on the roaming market, apart from the business model. And this comes on the one hand, from increasing operator hostility towards permanent roaming, and that’s driven of course by the business model as well as emergence of things like ‘roam like at home’ in the EU which takes away some of the upside on the consumer side for all that.

Steffen Sorrell (17:40):
And the second side of pressure is on the part of regulators themselves, particularly in markets like China, India, Brazil, Turkey, even the UAE now has a specific regulation which says that business data must reside within the country, you can’t apply a traditional roaming model. So the regulators are having a big impact on the one hand, while operators are having a big impact on the other hand. So if you’re in the shoes of the customer saying, okay, I want my device fleet out there, I want it to be out there for 10 years or more. That pressure from the MNO –

Nick Earle (18:26):
I want assurity of connectivity, I don’t want to have to be someone who spends all the time monitoring roaming agreements and seeing whether they’re there or not and-

Steffen Sorrell (18:33):
Exactly. Exactly. I don’t want to spend 60 plus months developing and testing and prototyping and deploying only to find a year later either the regulator has decided that permanent roaming is not available or-

Nick Earle (18:48):
And that can happen. So roaming agreements are not financially or financially less than that’s the trap, that people don’t want them. They get terminated regularly and it appears to be increasing, not surprising given that the financial incentive is getting worse and regulators are increasingly stepping up for a variety of reasons, frankly, political and as well as protecting the hometown hero in the country and saying like Turkey is a very good one, three months and you’re off, unless you put a, let’s say a Turkcell.

Nick Earle (19:21):
So at this point, I guess we’ve shown a lot of light on just one element of why we didn’t get to that magic 50 billion figure. I mean, this is not a nice, easy, predictable world for people who are wanting to roll out IoT deployments. So that’s surprising that some of the bigger projects, when you look at that 11 billion versus the 50, our research shows us that mostly 11 billion was small regional projects. It didn’t need to go single skew globally around the world. And again, you’re reinforcing why that is, because if you want to create one widget manufacturer millions, ship it around the world and it just works. All the things that you talked about, make it almost impossible.

Nick Earle (20:03):
So let’s pivot then before everybody gets so depressed and they go, okay, I’m not going to do IoT, I give up. Because the IoT has a wonderful opportunity to reduce costs and increase productivity, collapse supply chains. We’ve talked a lot about in this series. On the horizon comes eSIM. And now the next thing people say is, don’t worry, I know the roaming model is broken. Perhaps they say, I know my model relies on roaming but don’t worry eSIM and then that takes us into eUICC, eSIM and eUICC, they’re going to solve this problem. That’s the latest thing is, don’t worry about it, we’ve got it covered. So first of all, for people who don’t know, maybe just a little bit, can you just briefly describe what the eSIM is? What is an eSIM and the eUICC standard? What’s that all about?

Steffen Sorrell (20:55):
Yeah. So eSIM is a little bit of a misnomer. It stands for embedded SIM, but actually it doesn’t have to be embedded can come in any SIM form factor. And really the main goal of the eSIM, so there’s two parts, you have the hardware side which is the eSIM chip itself and then you have eUICC which is a software framework for remote management and remote provisioning of the SIM card. So that’s what separates it from a traditional SIM card like you mentioned earlier.

Nick Earle (21:29):
By remote provisioning the ability to push an IMSI an international mobile subscriber identity over the air into the SIM, as opposed to it being hard-coded in, as it is with a proprietary MNO.

Steffen Sorrell (21:42):
Exactly. So you spoke earlier about how in your traditional SIM you’re locked into the operator. With eSIM, that’s no longer the case because you have this mechanism by other software platform to download a new operator profile wherever you are in the world. So what that means is on the production line, you don’t have to have different color coded SIM cards, depending on where they’re going anymore. You don’t even necessarily have to know exactly where they will end up anymore because the eSIM contains something called a bootstrap profile, which is designed to provide a sort of a startup connectivity-

Nick Earle (22:25):
Yeah, always connect yeah. Wherever it is.

Steffen Sorrell (22:27):
Wherever in the world and then it will use that bootstrap profile to download or activate and and operate a profile within that country.

Nick Earle (22:36):
But that’s the right one for that device?

Steffen Sorrell (22:39):
Exactly.

Nick Earle (22:40):
So now I feel better. I’m a user, oh, now I feel better. We’ve sold off all of our problems, have we?

Steffen Sorrell (22:46):
Not quite. It’s a little more complicated than that.

Nick Earle (22:54):
I think eUICC plays a role, we should make sure we cover that off as well. So I get the eSIM now, I’m seeing the light here say, okay, we’ll have eSIM, it’s got a bootstrap. It connects but it’s connecting on the wrong network but as soon as I’m connected, I can OTA over the air, push something in. That sounds good. So what’s this eUICC all about?

Steffen Sorrell (23:18):
So eUICC is a standardized framework made by the GSMA. So they have a security accreditation scheme. So they make sure that the production of the SIM card is secure with certified players and on the software side, you have certified players as well. So you have two components for IoT called the SM-DP and the SM-SR which is Subscription Management Data Preparation (SM-DP), Subscription Management Secure Routing (SM-SR).

Nick Earle (23:53):
These acronyms are going to become very important in about spoiler alert, very important in about five minutes so pay attention.

Steffen Sorrell (24:04):
The SM-DP is there to securely store operator profiles and then the SM-SR is used to take that profile and download it onto the device in a secure manner.

Nick Earle (24:18):
Okay, so let’s lay out the table in front of us. It sounded good. It sounded like we’ve solved everything so far, we know we haven’t, but just for the moments from the mess we had previously called the current state of the industry, we now have three things. We have the eSIM which is essentially programmable, it’s over the air programmable, it has a bootstrap. So it will connect. So you can put one SIM in every device now and then localize it or push an IMSI into it from an operator that you want locally. And then you have two critical bits of functionality, the SM-DP, which is the database if your like of the profiles, the IMSI codes, the profiles that are available to be pushed in over the air. And the SM-SR is like the switch. The SM-SR is the switch that says, if this device is conforming or is placed in this location, then push this in IMSI in, from the SM-DP list into the device.

Nick Earle (25:20):
So it sounds like we’ve sorted it. Now, you and I both know we haven’t. The reason I’m sort of dumbing it down, if you like, a lot of people again come to us being a global company and say, oh, no, no, no, I’ve been told by other players in the market or whatever, that the eSIM and the SM-DP and SM-SR, will solve all these problems. And still 80% of IoT projects are failing, right? So we know there’s another gotcha. So let’s go to the next chapter, if you like. Why does what you just described not solve all the problems you talked about previously?

Steffen Sorrell (26:02):
Well, it’s a very good reason when we look at eSIM today, there’s a lot of devices actually enabled with eSIM but only give or take 20% of those devices globally are actually using eSIM connectivity. And the reason is because of the complexities surrounding the SM-DP and the SM-SR.

Nick Earle (26:26):
What does that mean?

Steffen Sorrell (26:30):
If I’m a customer, it’s not as simple as me flicking a switch and saying, okay, I want to switch from operator A to operate B because the SM-DP in SM-SR live inside the operator’s domain. And normally what happens is when you switch between one operator and another one, you also have to switch over to a new SM-SR, a new SM-DP, which requires some pretty heavy integration in terms of APIs. Billing schedules might be different between operators.

Nick Earle (27:04):
So it’s loading again.

Steffen Sorrell (27:05):
Exactly. So this process can often take months.

Nick Earle (27:10):
It’s not a switch as people think, oh, I can switch OTA. So I’m on operator A, I need to go to B, wait a second, wait a second. I’m over. Or even if you’ve got your mobile phone, I have a Vodafone SIM in my mobile phone. If I want to move to EE, I can get a PAC code and I can do it. But you’re saying it’s a little bit more similar to that, because if I switch from Vodafone to EE, I’d know I’ve got a contract. I had a contract with Vodafone. I’ve now got a contract with EE, I’ve now got a new pricing schedule.

Nick Earle (27:46):
And in the case of IoT devices, if I’ve API integrated my device and the data into my backend application processes, I may have different set of APIs, I’ve got a different support number to call if things go wrong. So I’m enabling a transfer but I’m solving the problem and this is my words so keep me honest. With that level of implementation, we appear to be solving the problem for the MNO. MNO A can completely move the device to MNO B, when MNO A is done. But from the customer point of view, the customer now has got to do a reintegration for MNO B, which if you only had one or two devices, okay, but if you’ve got a thousand devices, 10,000 devices, a hundred thousand devices and you want to move them all the time to optimize connectivity, suddenly you’ve created even more work for yourself as the user.

Steffen Sorrell (28:42):
Yeah. You’re looking at months of work and a lot of work. And this is one of the reasons why when historically with eSIM, it’s mainly been limited to automotive applications because they were able to afford that those kinds of costs or at least absorb the costs whereas other IoT segments were-

Nick Earle (29:05):
Couldn’t afford it.

Steffen Sorrell (29:05):
Exactly.

Nick Earle (29:06):
And couldn’t rewrite their systems. So we almost got there. It looked like we could have global connectivity but actually when we double clicked on it, there was a yes but on the backend. Okay, now this wouldn’t be an Eseye podcast unless we said but there is another way. So I know you guys, in fact, that’s how we started up our business relationship and indeed the trigger for the white paper is that we were briefing you about what we do and how specifically we solve that problem.

Nick Earle (29:44):
So just for our listeners, Eseye does everything that Steffen has just talked about except the two key differences is that we actually run our own SM-DP and SM-SR in our cloud platform. And we interconnect with a whole series of MNOs. The net effect is we can switch between MNOs on a global basis. So if you need a localization in Turkey, we can switch you to a TurkCell. If you need localization in the US, we can switch you to Verizon SIM, the IMSI, OTA into our SIM. Same for China, et cetera, et cetera, we’ve got 14 of them but because we’ve got the abstracted SM-SR and SM-DP, although we’re doing the switch from the user point of view, none of these issues that you refer to exist, because you’re always connected to Eseye’s platform.

Nick Earle (30:40):
You don’t have to change your APIs, you still have the same pricing as we could fix pricing, you have the same support number. So our belief is that the only way you can implement the eSIM, deliver on the eSIM promises to abstract the SM-SR and the SM-DP up into a high level, which we call a virtual mobile network operator, VMNO, as opposed to an MVNO mobile virtual network operator, because mobile virtual network operators typically come from the consumer background and enable the transfer from A to B, but the user then has to do all that work, that months of work that you’re referring to.

Nick Earle (31:21):
So we’ve actually created a lot of the functionality that is within the MNO, as a software layer in the cloud, which means the devices can switch and all of these interfaces don’t have to change. And that was the genesis of the research report. Your view as an independent analyst on that solution and whether or not that is a step forward, not saying it’s the whole answer, but a step forward in solving these issues.

Steffen Sorrell (31:50):
Yeah. Well, I mean, like you said, so you’re a provider who has many different agreements with operators around the world. So in terms of that, you’re able to connect with what is it over 700 network operators?

Nick Earle (32:07):
Over 700 different networks with localization and roaming agreements. 14 localizations and however many different roaming agreements. So basically ubiquitous.

Steffen Sorrell (32:17):
Yeah, exactly. So from a coverage perspective, that’s pretty much sorted, but the key differentiator here is like you mentioned, the ownership of the SM-DP and SM-SR. If you can avoid that integration costs, if you can avoid the headaches that are associated with switching APIs or new management in terms of your business relationship, then the business case for eSIM becomes a lot more attractive. The fact is that eSIM itself is a little bit more expensive than a traditional SIM because in most cases there’s more memory on the cards, it’s a newer technology and of course, then you have those software components.

Nick Earle (33:03):
Yeah, it’s like an application. It’s almost like a small computer. There’s an application on the card and software components that enable these capabilities.

Steffen Sorrell (33:13):
Yeah. I think companies will be able to see, okay, I can see why I’m paying a little more for eSIM from sort of a high level perspective, but they might not understand the full challenge that has gone into it in terms of investment and complexity. Which is perhaps made them shy away. But if you’re able to deliver a solution that removes a lot of that complexity, then I think the idea of paying a little bit more to receive something that’s future-proof and standardized by the GSMA gives you a guarantee for IoT projects. We talked about how roaming is perhaps not the best idea for long term projects, so eSIM is the answer to that. But if eSIM is too expensive, that might stop you from getting into-

Nick Earle (34:02):
And that’s why I said, Steffen, I still don’t think it’s yet the holy grail because in reality, it’s an interesting scenario. In IoT back to where we started, you don’t know you’re going to have a problem until you’ve had a problem. And then the second time round, you say, well, I’m not going to do that again. I’ll make sure I fix that before I get started. Of our 2000 customers or so I would say 70, 80% of them have come to us after a failed project.

Nick Earle (34:34):
And so, the SIM costs a little bit more, the service may cost a little bit more, but if that means you get 99% first time global ubiquitous connectivity out of every device in every country. As opposed to 92 or 93% and have to swap SIMs or you have to change your APIs at the backend because of the eSIM switching problems that we referred to. You pretty soon realize that the costs of having to do all that work or the costs of not having access to 8% of your devices is many, many, many times greater than the cost of spending another 50 or 75 cents on the SIM.

Nick Earle (35:15):
The problem is that until you really realize that they are going to be issues, that little extra cost per SIM per device, it says, oh, you’re more expensive than others. So that’s why I think that we have to look at TCO, total cost of ownership and ROI metrics, which is what the IT industry in general had to do. Because it’s about delivering a business outcome and the business outcome is directly proportional to the percentage of connectivity, because what you’re really after is the data. I’m getting data from 92% of your devices, 92% of the coffee machines, 92% of lockers, 92% of heart monitors is not a good a business case as getting as near to a hundred percent as is physically technically possible.

Nick Earle (36:07):
So we’ve made strides and we are definitely seeing that this is the new model, the obstructed SM-SR, extracted SM-DP and eUICC enabled switching into a step two profile into an eSIM to get one product skew. So we’re definitely getting closer. At the risk of complicating a little bit more, and we won’t have time to go into this in as much detail, what about the guy who says, okay, I get all that but the company I’m talking to, it tells me I will, don’t worry about any of that because there’s something else coming. So, oh, no, wait, this is why it’s confusing for people. No, no, no, there’s always something else coming. Now this time over the horizon comes the iSIM. So can we cover that on this as we’re educating people, I’m sure. So how is the iSIM fundamentally different or isn’t it to what we just talked about?

Steffen Sorrell (37:09):
It is, and it isn’t okay.

Nick Earle (37:10):
Okay, that’s an easy answer.

Steffen Sorrell (37:13):
So iSIM basically takes the eSIM concept but instead of a separate SIM chip, it’s integrated into the system on chip itself.

Nick Earle (37:26):
It’s software inside Silicon.

Steffen Sorrell (37:31):
Exactly. Exactly. So what that means is that you have a smaller footprint when you’re manufacturing devices. You don’t need to have space for SIM chip anymore, which means that you don’t need to pay the extra cost for the SIM, so it saves you money and also it means that your devices can be smaller or you might actually have room to put whatever else you might want.

Nick Earle (37:59):
Presumably it also means that if the SIM is going to physically disappear and it’s not going to be on the board, it’s going to be firmware inside the chip, the mobile, the modem, then presumably all the more reason why you need to not have lock-in. You need to have ubiquitous connectivity capabilities because if you don’t have it the remediation process is not just change the SIM. You’d have to change the whole module if it didn’t have it. Modules are a lot more expensive and difficult to change devices than Samsung.

Steffen Sorrell (38:39):
Yeah. I mean, it’s funny that you mentioned that. I’m sure there are some listeners who have listened to iSIM and said, well, hang on, iSIM not coming. It’s already been commercialized. Well, actually iSIM might well have been commercialized by a few vendors but it hasn’t been standardized in the same way that the eUICC specification has. So right now you can’t take an iSIM and use that standardized framework to switch operator profiles at will. What’s happening right now is the GSMA is working on standardization, then over the next two, three years or so, we’ll start to see commercialization of standardized iSIM available on the market. And that will offer a lower cost hardware solution because it’s easy.

Nick Earle (39:30):
Okay Steffen, first of all, thank you for simplifying what is a very complicated environment. And we’ve covered a lot of ground. We’ve covered the connectivity, the complexity, the lack of adoption, the roaming, the commercial problems with roaming, the user issues, the declining price that the fractured broken economic model of roaming which leads to lack of surety going forward, the promise of eSIM and eUICC, the reality of eSIM, the importance of the SM-DP, the SM-SR and then the idea of the abstracted agnostic platform to solve those issues. And then into yes, but we still got some more issues to come as there always is in the IT world.

Nick Earle (40:16):
Some more issues to come with doing it all again, in regard to the iSIM world. And so hopefully in the future, we have another podcast where we say, now this is how we can solve the problem in the iSIM world. But we don’t need to do that yet because there’s only a certain amount of new technology that people can observe. I think the key takeaway is that eSIM is needed, ubiquitous connectivity is needed, eSIM is an important part of the solution and the SM-SR and the SM-DP and where they are, resident are really important factors to take into consideration for listeners when considering global, particularly global IoT deployment projects.

Nick Earle (40:56):
So a lot of content in this podcast. I want to thank you again, also give a shout out to Kaleido, your websites, your specialists in this area, this is what you do. And there is this 20 page report which goes into what we’ve talked about and more in a lot more detail, which is available on our website in the Resources section. In the meantime, let me wrap this up and thank our listeners. If any of you listening, I think there’s a subject we should go into in more detail, this was one of those subjects that people said, can we really go into this because it’s complicated and there’s lots of claims and counterclaims, so hopefully we’ve clarified things for you.

Nick Earle (41:33):
If there’s any other subjects you particularly want to go to as please reach out to us, either to myself on LinkedIn, Nick Earle, E-A-R-L-E of Eseye, E-S-E-Y-E, or just reach out to us on social media in other ways and we will take your inputs into account for future episodes. But in the meantime, I’d like to thank this week’s guest on the IoT Leaders podcast, Steffen Sorrell, who’s chief of research at Kaleido Intelligence. Thank you, Steffen and thank you for, as I say, taking a really complicated subject and simplifying it as much as is possible for our listeners. Thank you very much and thank you to everyone else for listening. Thanks Steffen.

Steffen Sorrell (42:13):
Thanks Nick.

Nick Earle (42:14):
Take care. Bye-bye.

Outro (42:16):
Thanks for tuning in to IoT leaders, a podcast brought to you by Eseye. Our team delivers innovative global IoT cellular connectivity solutions that just work, helping our customers deploy differentiated experiences and disrupt their markets. Learn more at eseye.com.

Outro (42:37):
You’ve been listening to IoT leaders, featuring digitization leadership on the front lines of IoT. Our vision for this podcast is to be your guide to IoT and digital disruption, helping you to plot the right route to success. We hope today’s lessons, stories, strategies, and insights have changed your vision of IoT. Let us know how we’re doing by subscribing, rating, reviewing and recommending us. Thanks for listening until next time.